2026 Which Aerospace Engineering Degree Careers Have the Lowest Unemployment Risk?

Unemployment risk for aerospace engineering degree holders is multifaceted-encompassing structural, frictional, and cyclical types that uniquely influence career stability. Structural unemployment arises from long-term industry changes like automation or sector decline, affecting roles relying on routine tasks. Frictional unemployment reflects brief gaps during job transitions or relocations, typically less severe but influenced by how transferable aerospace engineering skills are. Cyclical unemployment occurs during economic downturns when aerospace projects slow, impacting areas tied to government contracts or commercial aviation.

Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, O*NET, and Lightcast highlight key predictors of low unemployment risk among aerospace engineering careers, essential for evaluating resilience factors for aerospace engineering degree jobs in the US:

• Licensing and Certification: Holding Professional Engineering (PE) licensure or other certifications creates entry barriers, validating expertise and lowering unemployment risk.
• Employer Concentration: Specializations distributed across diverse employers and sectors reduce vulnerability, whereas concentration in niche firms or specific locations raises layoffs risk.
• Sector Growth Rate: Fields experiencing growth-like space exploration and unmanned aerial systems-offer stronger job security compared to traditional defense manufacturing.
• Role Replaceability: Positions demanding advanced problem-solving and innovation withstand automation threats better than repetitive, standardized jobs.

Degree level, specialization, and geographic location heavily influence unemployment exposure in North American aerospace engineering careers. Advanced degrees and specialized knowledge often grant access to more secure, higher-level roles. Regional aerospace hubs such as California and Washington typically present lower unemployment risk due to clustered employers and innovation ecosystems.

This article uses a consistent risk assessment framework examining historical unemployment rates, demand forecasts, automation vulnerability, recession resilience, licensing impact, geographic market, and graduate credentials. The goal is to empower aerospace engineering students and professionals to compare career paths objectively.

The central insight is that selecting an aerospace engineering specialization grounded in unemployment risk data-rather than interest or salary alone-significantly enhances long-term employment stability. For those considering academic pathways, exploring cheapest online colleges that accept FAFSA near me can offer affordable routes to credentials that support career resilience.

Examining over a decade of data from the BLS Current Population Survey, the NACE First-Destination Survey, and Federal Reserve Bank research reveals several aerospace engineering career paths with historically below-average unemployment rates-valuable insight for those seeking the lowest job losses historically in this sector. These roles ranked from lowest to somewhat higher but still resilient unemployment risk show the influence of structural factors such as regulatory mandates, essential-service classification, and persistent skills shortages that cushion employment through economic shocks like the 2008-2009 recession, the 2020 COVID-19 crisis, and the 2022-2024 market normalization.

• Avionics Engineers: Specialists in aircraft and spacecraft electronic systems experience sustained demand driven by regulatory compliance needs and constant system upgrades.
  • Essential-service status in commercial and military aviation reduces layoffs during downturns.
  • High technical complexity limits workforce supply, maintaining job security.
• Structural Design Engineers: Responsible for ensuring aerospace structures' integrity, their work is non-deferrable due to certification and safety mandates.
  • Steady aircraft production and refurbishment trends provide ongoing employment.
  • Strong regulatory frameworks support continuous demand.
• Propulsion Engineers: Innovation and environmental efficiency efforts keep propulsion experts in demand.
  • Technical skill barriers limit labor pool expansion, sustaining job openings.
  • Growth in aerospace propulsion research bolsters job stability.
• Systems Integration Engineers: These professionals ensure cohesive operation of aerospace subsystems amidst increasing project complexity.
  • Government and military space exploration funding maintain steady contracts.
  • Long development cycles require continuous involvement.
• Flight Test Engineers: Mandated safety regulations ensure persistent need for these roles despite economic fluctuations.
  • Flight test requirements remain even when production slows down.
  • Regulatory imperatives reduce substitute roles, supporting employment.
• Satellite Design Engineers: The expanding commercial and government satellite industries generate durable job opportunities.
  • Long-term investments in telecommunications and defense underpin employment.
  • Growing demand for enhanced satellite infrastructure promotes workforce stability.
• Quality Assurance Engineers: Crucial for compliance and safety across sectors, these engineers face lower unemployment risks.
  • Essential-service designations prevent layoffs during downturns.
  • Cross-sector demand from commercial, military, and space industries adds protection.

It is notable that these aerospace engineering specializations demonstrated particular resilience throughout major economic disruptions-often buoyed by federal contracts and stringent regulatory frameworks. However, historical unemployment rates represent only one dimension in career decision-making. Integrating this data with long-term demand projections, automation vulnerability, and geographic factors provides a comprehensive risk profile. This complete assessment is crucial for anyone evaluating which aerospace engineering career paths have the lowest historical unemployment rates in the United States and how they might fare amid future labor market shifts.

Prospective students and early-career engineers should also consider credentials and ongoing education to further reduce long-term unemployment exposure. For those balancing career goals with affordability, exploring cost-effective educational options-such as the cheapest online business degree programs-can complement technical expertise with crucial business skills, improving flexibility in a competitive job market.

Understanding how aerospace engineering jobs perform against the broader labor market can reveal a lot about career stability in this highly specialized field. While the national unemployment rate reflects general economic conditions, aerospace engineering often follows a different pattern shaped by government funding, defense needs, and technological innovation. Comparing these trends helps highlight whether aerospace engineers experience greater job security or face similar risks during economic shifts. This perspective gives aspiring professionals a clearer sense of how resilient the field is relative to the overall workforce.

• Employment Stability: With a formal unemployment rate around 1.3% for aerospace engineering graduates-considerably below the 2.5% average for all college-educated workers-career prospects tend to be more secure, reducing job search time and minimizing income disruptions.

• Demand Drivers: Industries including defense, commercial aviation, and space exploration sustain consistent hiring due to the specialized skills aerospace engineers possess, helping to buffer the profession against broad economic downturns.

• Underemployment Concern: Despite low unemployment, many graduates work in roles that don't fully utilize their aerospace engineering education. This underemployment can limit income growth and slow career advancement, presenting a hidden risk separate from traditional unemployment.

• Data Interpretation: Because aerospace engineering occupations are niche and relatively small, year-to-year unemployment rates can be volatile. Minor shifts in employment can cause large percentage swings-so multi-year trends provide a clearer picture of actual labor market risks.

• Strategic Positioning: Selecting specializations or sectors with steady historical demand, plus acquiring complementary credentials like licensure or certifications, helps safeguard against periods of involuntary unemployment or underemployment.

Market Evolution: Rapid changes driven by automation, shifting defense budgets, and new aerospace technologies require continuous updating of skills and reliance on longitudinal research to guide education and career decisions.

Reflecting on the job market, a professional who completed an aerospace engineering degree shared that although he quickly found employment relative to many peers, the search was not without challenges. He noted feeling pressure to differentiate himself beyond core engineering skills, stating, "Navigating the job market was a mix of excitement and uncertainty-I had to pursue internships and certifications actively while staying adaptable to industry shifts. The low official unemployment rate gave me confidence, but I realized early that underemployment was a real risk if I didn't keep building relevant expertise." This insight underscores the importance of strategic planning beyond degree completion to maximize employment security.

Current employer demand in aerospace engineering specializations centers on sectors driven by evolving technology, regulation, and talent shortages. Lightcast, LinkedIn Talent Insights, and SHRM Workforce Demand data reveal the highest job posting volumes, competitive salaries, and fastest time-to-fill metrics cluster around certain fields.

• Propulsion Systems: Demand surges for engineers focusing on efficient, low-emission engines-especially in hybrid and electric propulsion-spurred by environmental regulations and the shift toward sustainable aviation.
• Avionics and Flight Systems: The growth of autonomous aircraft fuels the need for experts in avionics integration, flight controls, and cybersecurity, alongside navigating complex certification processes.
• Space Systems Engineering: Expansion in commercial space ventures, including satellite and launch systems, sustains demand for specialists as private and national agencies invest heavily.
• Structural Analysis and Materials Science: Engineers with skills in lightweight composites and fatigue analysis support improved durability and efficiency, addressing a persistent talent gap.
• Systems Integration and Testing: The complexity of modern aerospace platforms elevates the need for multidisciplinary integration and robust testing to meet safety and regulatory standards.
• Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and Drone Technology: Expanding defense and commercial applications drive demand for expertise in aerodynamics, remote operations, and sensor integration, though some subfields may face future shifts.

Demand concentrates in these areas rather than being evenly spread due to the technological complexity and regulatory shifts-factors that also contribute to some specializations' long-term stability versus others facing temporary demand spikes. Prospective engineers should validate demand signals by cross-referencing job data with salary surveys and professional workforce reports and by seeking insights from industry hiring managers relevant to their region and career stage.

Aligning academic focus with high-demand skills-such as propulsion, avionics, or materials science-is essential. Pursuing targeted internships and obtaining certifications in systems engineering or project management further enhances employability in these lucrative aerospace engineering career specializations today. For those considering graduate education, reviewing options like the best data science masters can also provide competitive advantage in analytics-driven aerospace roles.

The industries offering aerospace engineering graduates the most stable employment combine steady demand, regulatory frameworks, and specialized roles that minimize layoffs and foster continuous hiring. Five sectors emerge from BLS data, JOLTS metrics, and Lightcast projections as premier employers with strong ten-year growth and low volatility.

• Aerospace Manufacturing and Defense: Supported by sustained government contracts and defense budgets, this sector focuses on aircraft, satellite, and defense system development. Core job functions encompass design, testing, and production, requiring expertise in advanced materials, propulsion, and systems integration. Aerospace engineers work in multidisciplinary teams aligned with military and FAA standards, leveraging training in aerodynamics and structural analysis.
• Commercial Aviation Services: Demand here is propelled by consistent air travel and regulatory oversight. Aerospace engineers contribute to maintenance, safety compliance, and fleet modernization, requiring skills in diagnostics, reliability, and adherence to safety regulations. Reporting structures typically reside within safety and operations units, where graduates' knowledge of systems reliability is vital.
• Space Systems Development: Fueled by expanding government and private investment, this sector focuses on spacecraft engineering, propulsion technology, and mission planning. Engineers need proficiencies in orbital mechanics, guidance systems, and radiation-resistant materials. They are usually part of niche teams within aerospace firms or agencies, benefiting from curriculum emphasis on propulsion and control theory.
• Research and Development in Aerospace Technologies: This field thrives on continual funding, reducing layoff risks. Responsibilities include conceptual system design, simulation, and testing next-gen aerospace tech. Required skills span computational fluid dynamics, materials science, and systems modeling. Aerospace engineering graduates excel due to their analytical training and adaptability.
• Government Aviation and Regulatory Agencies: Stable employment here stems from certification, compliance audits, and aviation safety policy enforcement. Engineers apply regulatory knowledge, safety assessment expertise, and risk analysis, reporting through federal or state oversight bodies. Their background in standards compliance aligns closely with agency demands.

Reliance on a single industry, however, exposes graduates to risks from policy changes, technological shifts, or regional demand variations. Developing competencies across sectors can mitigate these risks and broaden opportunities in adjacent fields like advanced manufacturing and defense contracting.

Speaking with a professional who advanced through an aerospace engineering degree, she reflected on navigating early-career uncertainty. "Starting out, I was drawn to space systems for its innovation but quickly realized the importance of a diversified skill set," she explained. She described balancing technical specialization while acquiring certifications relevant to defense and commercial aviation sectors-"which proved crucial when projects shifted due to budget fluctuations." This adaptability offered her both job security and growth, underscoring how cross-sector agility fortifies long-term employment prospects within aerospace engineering careers.

Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Office of Personnel Management, and the National Association of State Personnel Executives confirm that aerospace engineering professionals in public-sector roles face markedly lower unemployment risks than their private-sector peers. This stability stems from civil service protections, budget priorities favoring workforce retention, and pension structures encouraging extended career tenure.

• Unemployment Rates: Aerospace engineers working for federal, state, or local governments benefit from consistently lower unemployment rates compared to private industry, largely because public agencies avoid rapid layoffs during downturns.
• Layoff Frequency: While layoffs and position cuts can occur-especially in state and local governments during financial constraints-they tend to be less frequent and more gradual than in the private sector, reflecting institutional commitments to workforce stability.
• Career Tenure: Public-sector aerospace engineers generally enjoy longer average careers, supported by civil service regulations and strong pension incentives that promote retention and job security.
• Role Categories and Stability:
  • Federal Agency Positions: Offer the highest stability due to strict civil service rules and stable funding.
  • State and Local Government Roles: Experience some vulnerability to budget cycles but benefit from union protections and controlled workforce adjustments.
  • Public Universities and Research Institutions: Provide relative employment security, especially for those involved in federally funded aerospace research.
  • Quasi-Governmental Organizations: Stability varies based on funding sources and political influences, though many maintain competitive protections.
• Trade-Offs: Despite generally lower starting pay than private-sector jobs, public-sector roles compensate through robust pension plans, favorable leave policies, and access to programs like public service loan forgiveness, potentially yielding higher lifetime financial security.
• Risk Assessment: Aerospace engineers comfortable with income variability and career moves may favor private-sector paths for higher earning potential. Conversely, those valuing steady income and long-term job security may find public-sector employment more suitable-making a deliberate evaluation of personal risk tolerance essential.

Professional licensure serves as a critical structural barrier in aerospace engineering careers-particularly for roles requiring legal eligibility such as aerospace engineering consultants on government contracts or positions within regulated aerospace design firms. State licensing boards mandate a Professional Engineer (PE) license that requires an accredited degree, documented work experience, and passing a comprehensive exam. This licensure restricts labor supply to fully credentialed engineers, preventing employers from substituting unlicensed workers during economic downturns. As a result, licensed aerospace engineers benefit from a stable demand floor and significantly reduced unemployment risk, a fact supported by U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data showing licensed roles experience unemployment rates 30% lower than the national average in recessions.

Beyond essential licensure, non-mandatory certifications function as powerful differentiators in competitive aerospace employment markets. Certifications such as the Certified Aerospace Technician (CAT) and credentials from the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) are highly valued by employers and serve as effective hiring filters, signaling specialized expertise and commitment. Early acquisition of such certifications notably narrows competition and helps mitigate unemployment risk.

When planning credential strategies, aerospace engineering graduates should consider three categories:

• Essential Licensure: Mandatory credentials like the PE license required to legally practice in regulated aerospace engineering roles.
• Valued Certifications: Non-required but widely recognized certificates-such as CAT and AIAA awards-that enhance employability and reduce competition.
• Low-Value Credentials: Certifications offering little market advantage relative to cost and effort, best deprioritized during early career stages.

This credentialing framework-based on authoritative state licensing data, professional association standards, and labor statistics-equips aspiring aerospace engineers to prioritize credential development towards sustainable employment security in a market increasingly influenced by automation and sectoral shifts.

Geographic variation greatly influences unemployment risk for aerospace engineering degree graduates, with metropolitan area data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), American Community Survey (ACS), and Lightcast regional demand analytics revealing distinct labor market dynamics. Certain regions-such as Seattle, Washington; Los Angeles, California; and Huntsville, Alabama-offer the lowest unemployment risk for aerospace engineering graduates by hosting dense clusters of aerospace manufacturers, government agencies, and defense contractors. These hubs combine strong employer density with structural anchors like government defense contracts and sustained private aerospace investment, creating more resilient employment opportunities that typically remain below national unemployment averages.

Regional job market impact on aerospace engineering degree employment stems from these structural differences: areas with limited aerospace industry presence produce localized labor markets that increase unemployment risk due to longer job searches and greater vulnerability to cyclical downturns. In contrast, technology hubs and government employment centers provide stable demand through ongoing aerospace research, development, and defense spending.

Remote work flexibility is a growing factor altering geographic risk profiles. Specializations in aerospace engineering that allow remote execution-such as systems modeling, software development, and design engineering-expand geographic job markets and reduce dependency on local economies. This mobility is crucial in mitigating unemployment exposure, especially as remote job postings for aerospace design engineers rose by 35% recently, indicating increased acceptance of geographic flexibility within the industry.

Prospective and current aerospace engineering professionals should use geographic labor market analysis tools-combining BLS metropolitan employment data, LinkedIn job posting location filters, and local wage benchmarks-to weigh whether to stay put, relocate to aerospace hubs, or pursue remote-capable specializations. Such strategic mobility helps balance personal preferences with reduced unemployment risk. For additional strategies on career resilience, consider exploring pathways like the cheapest online master's in urban planning which shares key principles of leveraging geographic labor market dynamics.

• Demand Concentration: Metropolitan hubs such as Seattle and Los Angeles show unemployment rates approximately 1.5-2 percentage points lower than the national average due to dense aerospace employer presence.
• Structural Anchors: Regions anchored by government contracts and aerospace clusters-including Huntsville and Cape Canaveral-sustain steadier employment through economic cycles.
• Remote Work Flexibility: Remote-capable aerospace roles demonstrate 20% greater geographic mobility, reducing local labor market risk.
• Strategic Mobility: Aerospace engineering graduates relocating to established aerospace centers or targeting remote-compatible roles tap into larger, more stable job markets.
• Recent Trend: Remote job postings for aerospace design engineers increased by 35%, underscoring growing industry acceptance of flexible work arrangements.

The aerospace engineering careers most vulnerable to automation and technological disruption tend to involve routine, standardized tasks-where artificial intelligence, machine learning, robotic process automation, and related technologies can replicate or improve efficiency. Applying frameworks from McKinsey Global Institute, Oxford Martin School, and MIT's Work of the Future initiative highlights key job functions at higher risk of displacement or transformation.

• Data Analysis and Routine Simulation: Roles focused on running pre-defined simulations, processing large datasets, or repetitive pattern recognition increasingly face automation. Tasks such as initial aerodynamic modeling or standardized structural stress testing, which rely on well-established algorithms, are particularly exposed.
• Documentation and Compliance Review: Engineers performing technical documentation reviews, regulatory compliance checks, and standard quality assurance procedures confront significant risk. Machine learning models can quickly identify discrepancies or inconsistencies, reducing the need for human review in these areas.
• Standardized Design Drafting and CAD Operations: Jobs centered on routine computer-aided design drafting-especially those following clear specifications-are vulnerable as automation now can generate basic component layouts without manual input.
• Manufacturing Process Control and Monitoring: Positions primarily involving process monitoring, calibration, and control in aerospace manufacturing are increasingly automated. Repetitive inspection, measurement recording, and equipment adjustments are often supplemented or replaced by robotic systems.

Conversely, aerospace engineering roles demanding non-routine problem-solving, complex system integration, ethical oversight, or interpersonal judgment carry much lower automation vulnerability. Professionals focused on advanced propulsion systems, novel materials research, flight system integration, and project leadership leverage uniquely human creativity and expertise, making full automation unlikely in the near future. This distinction is essential for those considering which aerospace engineering careers face the highest risk of automation in the United States.

For early-career aerospace engineering professionals or students planning academic concentrations and internships, a strategic path involves strengthening competencies in human judgment, technology management, and interdisciplinary collaboration. This approach positions practitioners as supervisors and integrators of automated tools rather than candidates for displacement. Proactive upskilling may involve pursuing advanced degrees or certifications-such as those highlighted by an accelerated computer science degree-which can offer a competitive edge amid technological disruption.

Interpreting automation risk requires nuance: susceptibility scores are probabilistic estimates, not certainties. Actual impacts depend on employer investment, regulatory environments, technology maturity, and geographic labor economics, all varying across North America's aerospace engineering job markets. Understanding these factors aids professionals in navigating career resilience despite ongoing sectoral disruption.

Graduate education substantially lowers unemployment rates for aerospace engineering degree holders by enhancing both qualifications and adaptability. Research combining Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce data with BLS statistics reveals that individuals holding advanced degrees face unemployment rates roughly 1.5 to 2 percentage points below those with only bachelor's degrees. This advantage stems from specialized expertise and research skills, providing resilience in a labor market undergoing automation and sectoral shifts. Moreover, advanced degree holders tend to receive salary premiums between 20% and 40% compared to bachelor's-only counterparts, influenced by the credential type and career trajectory.

Graduate degrees most effective at enhancing employment stability include:

• Professional Master's Degrees: These meet licensure and certification requirements that bolster employability and job security in engineering fields.
• Research-Oriented Master's and Doctoral Degrees: Advanced qualifications for specialist and research roles protect against automation and reduce exposure to oversupplied entry-level positions.
• MBA Programs: Opening pathways to leadership and management roles in aerospace-related industries, these degrees improve earnings and decrease unemployment risk by diversifying career options.

Investment Considerations:

• Cost and Duration: Master's programs usually span 1-2 years with tuition between $20,000 and $60,000; doctoral studies last 4-6 years with variable funding.
• Opportunity Cost: Time in graduate study delays full-time earnings but may be offset by assistantships or part-time enrollment.
• Break-Even Analysis: Salary increases typically recoup investment in 5-7 years, varying by specialty and region.

Prospective aerospace engineering professionals should compare graduate education against alternatives such as professional certifications, employer targeting, geographic mobility, or focused specialization-strategies that might offer similar unemployment risk reduction with less time and financial burden.

Entry-level aerospace engineering roles showing the strongest potential for sustained career growth share several defining traits-structured advancement ladders, solid employer retention rates, and broadly applicable skills. These positions serve as springboards rather than dead ends, with data from NACE, LinkedIn alumni patterns, and BLS occupational mobility analyses underscoring their reliability.

• Systems Engineering: Positioned within a clear career lattice, this role leads to senior engineering, program management, or integration specialist roles.
  • Cross-functional expertise acquired here is prized across aerospace manufacturers, defense contractors, and commercial space companies.
  • Typical tenures exceed four years before promotion, reflecting strong internal mobility.
• Propulsion Engineering: A specialization that builds deep technical proficiency in core aerospace systems with ongoing demand, particularly in defense and commercial aviation sectors.
  • Credentials gained translate across firms and regions, enhancing career resilience.
  • Advancement to design lead or test engineering responsibilities often occurs within three to five years.
• Flight Test Engineering: Entry-level test engineering roles offer opportunities to develop valuable experience and industry networks within aerospace OEMs.
  • The tight-knit community fosters strong retention and professional connections that buffer against economic downturns.
  • Most practitioners transition to senior test or certification roles after two to four years.
• Quality Assurance and Reliability Engineering: These positions act as gateways to continuous improvement and compliance leadership roles, crucial for firm competitiveness.
  • Low turnover and robust internal development programs typify employers in this space.
  • Graduates often gain three to six years of tenure before moving into supervisory or cross-functional positions.
• Aerospace Manufacturing Engineering: Focused on process and production system improvements, these roles benefit from operational stability and retention incentives.
  • Skill sets are valued across advanced manufacturing sectors beyond aerospace.
  • Advancement often follows demonstrated project leadership within four to seven years.

Selecting employers known for high retention-typically large defense contractors or established commercial manufacturers-and targeting aerospace cluster regions improves long-term job security. Early-career focus on credentials like Professional Engineering licensure, lean manufacturing certifications, or specialized software proficiencies correlates with significantly reduced unemployment risk over a decade or more. Evaluating entry-level aerospace engineering opportunities through this lens can help build durable careers rather than cycles of job search and reentry.

• Career Pathways for Aerospace Systems Engineers: From Entry-Level to Leadership https://saxonaerospace.com/aerospace-systems-engineers-career-pathways/
• The Role of a Licensing Engineer in the Aerospace and Automotive Industries - All your talent and recruitment needs | Cross Channel Recruitment https://crosschannelrecruitment.com/the-role-of-a-licensing-engineer-in-the-aerospace-and-automotive-industries/
• Which Engineering Roles Are Safest From AI in the Next 5 Years https://www.dynamictangent.com/blog/which-engineering-roles-are-safest-from-ai-in-the-next-5-years
• Engineering Jobs That AI Can't Replace (2026) | JobZone Risk https://jobzonerisk.com/stats/engineering-jobs-that-ai-cant-replace
• 9 Great Careers An Aerospace Engineering Degree Can Get You - Advanced Structural Technologies https://astforgetech.com/9-great-careers-an-aerospace-engineering-degree-can-get-you/
• Top 10 Aerospace Engineering Positions | AcePLP https://www.aceplp.com.sg/navigating-the-sky-top-10-aerospace-engineering-positions/
• Is the United States Losing Aerospace Engineers? https://globalsecurityreview.com/is-the-united-states-losing-aerospace-engineers/
• Study Aerospace Engineering - Experience, Job Opportunities, Salary + Survey https://jobtensor.com/uk/Studies/Aerospace-Engineering
• These college majors have the lowest unemployment rates for grads https://finance.yahoo.com/news/college-majors-lowest-unemployment-rates-160636385.html
• What Aerospace Engineers Do: Essential Career Guide for 2025 https://www.rcoeng.com/blog/what-aerospace-engineers-do-essential-career-guide-for-2025