11 Free Plagiarism Checker Tools for Students and Teachers for 2026

Imed Bouchrika, Phd

by Imed Bouchrika, Phd

Co-Founder and Chief Data Scientist

Share



List of Plagiarism Checker Tools

Statistics For 11 Free Plagiarism Checker Tools For Students and Teachers For 2026

With thousands of papers and articles published each day and millions more already in existence, it’s easy to see how untenable it is to manually check each paper submission for plagiarized content. But with sophisticated web crawlers and search-optimized plagiarism checker tools, the lives of publishers, writers, editors, students, teachers, and many more have become so much easier and manageable.

Plagiarism tools come in various flavors, from free plagiarism checker tools for students and teachers, editors, etc., to premium applications with more powerful algorithms, capabilities, and features. They do more than check for suspiciously familiar content: they can also enhance your writing style, use of grammar, and so much more. Your access to these applications, however, is often limited by how much you can or are willing to pay. You will find that premium plagiarism checker applications are often priced steeply. If you’re only checking a single output, subscribing to one simply does not make sense. The alternative is to use free plagiarism checkers that come with many bonus features.

This article presents the top plagiarism checkers, their key features, and how well they perform. To check their performance, we employed a simple test of copying and pasting content from the PDF copy of an academic journal. The free plagiarism checker tools were then ranked primarily based on their level of accuracy in detecting the unattributed content. Secondary considerations include additional features like character or word count limits, file formats supported, reporting features, and citation generation. Keep on reading to know which is the best free online plagiarism checker on the market and other worthwhile options.

Statistics on Plagiarism

Academic institutions often have clear-cut zero-tolerance policies for students caught plagiarizing their research and essays. This is because of the widespread incidence of plagiarism among higher education students, which presents an increasing concern for school administrators and faculty who are serious in defending academic integrity (MacLennan, 2018). However, it is a bit different for research professionals submitting their work to journals for publication where even self-plagiarism is not allowed. Self-plagiarism is when the author reuses previously published content and passes it off as new without telling the reader where the work previously appeared (Roig, 2011).

In a plagiarism study by Enders et al. (2004), they found that only 19% of journal editors had formal plagiarism policies within their organizations. As such, journal editors can respond to instances of plagiarism in a number of ways. In the survey, 70.9% said that notifying the original author as soon as possible is definitely an appropriate response to a clear case of plagiarism (Enders, Walter & Hoover, Gary, 2004). However, 42% said informing the plagiarists’ dean and other superiors is not likely an appropriate response. Moreover, 51% said that informing the public about the incident is also not likely an appropriate response.

Another plagiarism study by Karabag & Berggren (2012) tried to relate the issue to papers that were retracted due to intellectual dishonesty. They observed that science journals are more active in retracting papers than business and economic journals. For instance, they found more than 700 papers retracted from ScienceDirect, a database of scientific journals from 1985 to 2012. In contrast, they only found seven retraction notices from Emerald Management Journals. This led them to conclude that “the leading business and economics journals’ response to academic dishonesty and plagiarism has been slow (Karabag and Berggren, 2012)."

One prominent case of plagiarism involved Harvard Law professor Charles Ogletree. He admitted to copying word for word six paragraphs from the work of another law professor to his book (Pacia, 2004). Ogletree issued a public apology, after which an internal investigation found he committed an honest mistake (Torres, 2004). This decision was criticized by The Harvard Crimson as imposing double standards on students and professors caught plagiarizing (The Crimson Staff, 2004).

In another case, Bindu Ganga, the director of training at Argosy University-Chicago was found to have plagiarized her doctoral research project about lying (Newbart, 2006). Ganga was fired from her job and stripped of her Doctor of Psychology degree (Newbart, 2007). This was after allegations of plagiarism from a student were confirmed by Turnitin, which showed her work was roughly 45% similar to other published works.

These unfortunate cases illustrate the importance of ensuring one’s research is plagiarism-free, no matter the type of degree or profession, to avoid damage to one’s professional reputation and career. Having a free plagiarism checker like Turnitin enables editors to easily spot plagiarized content and recommend revisions or apply adjustments to documents.

Top 11 Free Plagiarism Checkers

1. Quetext

Considered by some as the best online plagiarism checker, Quetext quickly spots plagiarized sections and also serves as a citation assistant. It has a free Instant Search feature that helps you review your work with lightning speed. Their patented DeepSearch technology provides you with contextual analysis, fuzzy matching, and conditional scoring (Quetext, n.d.). With this, Quetext was able to correctly detect 100% of content copied and pasted from an academic journal.

Quetext has a free plan that allows you to get five free plagiarism checks every month. First-time users can get 500 words analyzed for free. More searches require you to register for free.

The free plan includes a decent amount of features for helping you steer clear of improperly attributing your sources. Contextual analysis does not only look at how closely the words match between different sources, but also considers the context of the phrases. It likewise detects synonyms in rewritten phrases through fuzzy matching. Meanwhile, conditional scoring gives weight to each match found in your work in addition to its total DeepSearch score. Once the software is done analyzing your work, its patented ColorGrade feedback gives you a visual guide for which parts of your work need to be corrected. Even with the free version, you get a citation assistant where you can manually input the details of your source material. As such, Quetext is one of the best free plagiarism checker online tools you can use for your research.

2. Plagiarisma

Plagiarisma brands itself as a Copyscape or Turnitin alternative free platform with comparable capabilities (Plagiarisma, n.d.). Prior to its widespread use, scholars (see, for instance, Collberg & Kobourov, 2005) had suggested the use of a 1:1 comparison approach for plagiarism checking, Plagiarisma had since been utilized in its program.

The basic tool helps you check your work against duplicate sentences online. Though the site looks dated, a simple test of copy and pasting exact content from an academic journal accurately yielded a 0% unique result. This makes it one of the best plagiarism checker free options online.

The webpage is straightforward to use. Simply paste the text you want to check in the text box and click the Check for Duplicate Button. Instead of using the text box, you can also upload a file to the site. You can check your work against a specific URL. File types supported include TXT, HTML, RTF, and more. The online tool supports searches for over 190 languages. It’s also possible to search for content using Google Scholar and Google Books.

However, the plagiarism checker free version supports search results for Bing only. Access to Google search results is reserved for registered users only. You can sign up as a registered user for free to get more features like faster results and fuzzy logic search.

3. Originality.ai

Originality.ai is an advanced AI-driven tool that helps content creators, marketers, and businesses maintain high standards for originality in their written work. By leveraging AI-powered technology, Originality.ai can effectively detect instances of both plagiarism and AI-generated content, ensuring that written materials are truly unique. With a focus on delivering precise and accurate detection, it’s designed to support creators and companies that prioritize integrity in their content.

The platform’s functionality is user-friendly and efficient, offering seamless integration for individuals and teams. Users can access Originality.ai’s scanning capabilities directly or through its Chrome extension, allowing for quick checks across various writing and publishing workflows. Its intuitive dashboard provides real-time feedback on content originality scores, which makes it an ideal tool for editors, writers, and marketing teams who need to validate authenticity before publishing.

In addition to plagiarism and AI detection, Originality.ai provides a suite of features that enhance overall content quality. The platform offers customizable scanning options, allowing users to choose the type and depth of analysis suited to their needs. With competitive pricing and dedicated support for SEO and content marketing professionals, Originality.ai caters to a wide range of industries, making it a valuable asset for anyone committed to producing authentic, high-quality content.

Screenshot 2024-10-30 at 18.19.23.png

4. Search Engine Reports

A free plagiarism checker that both content writers and researchers can use is Search Engine Reports. The online search analyzer has a rather generous limit of 2,000 words for running its plagiarism check. You can upload a file from your computer or from Dropbox. In addition, its URL exclusion feature is not only free but is capable of running up to five URLs at the same time. It’s also available in 17 languages. 

It also offers three different ways to view your plagiarism search results: sentence-wise results, matched sources, or document view (Search Engine Reports, n.d.). The interface and ranking system looks very similar to that of Small SEO Tools but is more accurate. Once the plagiarism check is done, you can view the report from another webpage and share it. You can also download it as a PDF file. If it detects plagiarized content, it will give you a link to similar content. There will also be an option for you to rewrite the plagiarized content through their paraphrasing tool. Though not as accurate as Quetext or Plagiarisma, its user-friendly, visual presentation of its plagiarism check is helpful in addressing problematic parts of one’s work.

5. Plagium

As a free plagiarism checker similar to Turnitin, Plagium is an easy-to-use tool that allows you to detect plagiarized content in text and URLs. It does this by dividing the text into snippets and comparing them to online sources. Plagium claims that this method gives users cleaner, less noisy search results compared to other search engines (Plagium, n.d.). Moreover, Plagium correctly identified the source URL of a sample plagiarized text.

As is standard with free online plagiarism checkers, the Plagium website features a text box where you can put in text for analyzing. You can put a maximum of 1,000 characters in the text box. It gives you options to do a Quick Search or a Deep Search, but only the Quick Search option can be used without creating an account. Quick Search shows you links to matched documents the software found online. However, it does not give you a percentage of how much content was plagiarized.

Plagium also has plans which bill you for every page you search. An alternative to these is their free Google Docs add-on which has no limits on how much text you can select. It is convenient in that it highlights parts of the document where the software has detected duplicate content online. It also provides you with the links to the online source. However, its shortcoming is that it does not give you a side-by-side comparison of your work and the matched result. Still, the accuracy of its plagiarism search results makes it one of the best free plagiarism checkers available online.

6. Small SEO Tools

A plagiarism checker is one out of a hundred tools that you can find for free in the Small SEO Tools site. The tool caters mostly to the needs of content writers and freelancers who want to make sure their work is plagiarism-free for better SEO ranking. Not only is it a candidate for the best online free plagiarism checker; it can serve as a handy research tool, too.

Small SEO Tools’ plagiarism checker allows you to paste text onto the text box or upload a document in various file formats. These include .tex, .txt, .doc, and more. Uploading a document from Google Drive or Dropbox is also possible. With the free tool, you can scan up to 1,000 words per search. Like most free services, you can put in a webpage URL to run a plagiarism check. You can also exclude a specific URL from your search, a feature that you would have to pay for with other providers.

Other useful features include percentage gauges, which give you objective data about how much plagiarized content is present. Its list-based, sentence-wise results show you unique versus plagiarized sentences in an easy-to-follow color-coded format, which is akin to how word cloud generator tools show related words or concepts. You can view a side-by-side comparison with your work versus matched results with the Document View feature. It even has a built-in automatic rewriting feature which allows you to change the wording of plagiarized content with just one click. They also have a mobile Plagiarism Checker app for iOS and Android (Small SEO Tools, n.d.). Though it is feature-rich, it only detected a small fraction of plagiarized content.

Beyond Plagiarism: Elevating Your Research Workflow

Tips on Choosing and Using a Free Plagiarism Checker Tool

References:

  • Collberg, C., & Kobourov, S. (2005). Self-plagiarism in computer science. https://doi.org/10.1145/1053291.1053293
  • Enders, Walter & Hoover, Gary. (2004). Whose line is it? Plagiarism in economics. https://doi.org/10.1257/0022051041409066
  • Karabag, S.F., & Berggren, C. (2012). Retraction, dishonesty and plagiarism: analysis of a crucial issue for academic publishing, and the inadequate responses from leading journals in economics and management disciplines. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2190694
  • Lahiry, S., & Sinha, R. (2019). Creativity is intelligence having fun, originality an undetected plagiarism! https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdvl.IJDVL_71_18
  • MacLennan, H. (2018). Student perceptions of plagiarism avoidance competencies: An action research case study. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v18i1.22350
  • Newbart, D. (2006, February 19.) Student scolded by Argosy after accusing school official of plagiarizing project. Chicago Sun-Times.
  • Newbart, D. (2007, December 31). Argosy plagiarism was ‘unintentional’ Academic says Poshard got off easier. Chicago Sun-Times.
  • Pacia, R. (2004, September 14). Harvard Law prof admits to plagiarism. Yale Daily News
  • PaperRater (n.d.). Paperrater: Features powered by artificial intelligence. PaperRater.com.
  • Plagiarisma (n.d.). Free online plagiarism checker for teachers and students. Copyscape and Turnitin alternative. Plagiarisma.com.
  • Plagium (n.d.). Plagium by Septet Systems Doc Add-on: Overview. G Suite Marketplace
  • Plagramme (n.d.). Free plagiarism check. Plagramme.com.
  • Pre Post SEO (n.d.). Why Prepostseo Plagiarism Checker? PrePostSEO.com.
  • Quetext (n.d.). DeepSearch™ Technology. Quetext.com.
  • Roig, M. (2011). Avoiding Plagiarism, Self-plagiarism, and Other Questionable Writing Practices: A Guide to Ethical Writing. Tuscaloosa, AL: Department of Biological Sciences, College of Arts & Sciences, The University of Alabama.
  • Search Engine Reports (n.d.) Plagiarism checker. SearchEngineReports.com.
  • Small SEO Tools (n.d.). Features of our plagiarism checker. Small SEO Tools.com.
  • The Crimson Staff (2004, September 13). What academia is hiding. The Harvard Crimson.
  • Torres, H. (2004, September 25.). Ogletree admits to plagiarism. The Harvard Law Record.
  • Editpad (n.d.). Free plagiarism checker. Editpad.org
```