Top 10 Qualities of Good Academic Research for 2026

by Imed Bouchrika, Phd

Co-Founder and Chief Data Scientist

Share

Today’s technology has vastly improved one’s access to knowledge. As such, this has contributed to the production of notable academic research. In fact, a report from the National Science Foundation shows that the global research output for science and engineering increased at an annual rate of around 4% in the last decade. It is made evident by the large volume of peer-reviewed journal articles and conference papers published each year.

Academic research writing involves more than just choosing a topic, collecting and analyzing data, and leveraging academic writing tools. To be considered good, research must meet certain criteria. This article aims to answer the question “What are the characteristics of a good research?" by listing the criteria for such research. Hopefully, this guide can help researchers ensure the quality of research output.

Qualities of Good Academic Research Table of Contents

1. What is academic research?
2. How to select a research topic?
3. Qualities of Good Research
4. Common Pitfalls of Doing Research
5. Technology's Role in Enhancing the Quality of Academic Research
6. Can advanced degree programs elevate research quality?
7. How Can Mentorship and Professional Development Enhance Research Quality?
8. The Importance of Adaptability in Modern Research Practices
9. How Can Structured Academic Training Enhance Research Quality?
10. How Can Open Access and Publication Strategies Optimize Research Impact?
11. How Does Interdisciplinary Collaboration Enhance Research Outcomes?
12. How Do Career Incentives Shape Academic Research Quality?

Qualities of Good Research

1. Good research is anchored on a sound research question.

A sound research question is one of the most important characteristics of good research. In fact, formulating one is embedded in the curricula of research-heavy programs like engineering and physics degrees and careers. In 2010, Farrugia et al. proposed that developing a research question is the most important step in doing a research project, and is at the core of what makes a good research.

A good research question details exactly what a researcher wants to learn and defines a study’s scope. By formulating a good research question, researchers can ensure that they stay on track during the course of their study. This research question sets the scope of the study to a specific age group and focuses on the relationship between aerobic exercise and mental health outcomes. With a clear research question, researchers can design a study and develop a scope of work sample that includes selecting appropriate participants, determining the measurement instruments, collecting and analyzing data, and drawing conclusions based on the results.

However, the formulation of a research question is often easier said than done. As such, numerous frameworkslike the FINER and PICO criteriahave been invented to help researchers formulate sound research questions.

For instance, Cummings et al. (2013) suggest using FINER criteria to create or evaluate a research question. According to this set of criteria, a good research question is:

• F feasible
• I interesting
• N novel
• E ethical
• R relevant

2. Good research follows a systematic, appropriate research methodology.

The overall quality and success of a research study are largely determined by the research methodology it uses (Thattamparambil, 2020). Choosing an appropriate research methodology helps ensure that researchers can collect relevant data and use the right data analysis techniques.

A good research methodology is another quality of good research. It refers to the systematic procedures or techniques a researcher uses to ensure that his study achieves valid, reliable results (Jansen & Warren, 2020). Research methodologies are often classified into qualitative research, quantitative research, and mixed-methods research.

• Qualitative research methodology involves collecting and analyzing non-numerical data, such as language to interpret subjects’ beliefs, experiences, and behaviors (Pathak et al., 2013). Qualitative research techniques include interviews, focus groups, and case studies.
• Quantitative research methodologies involve the collection and analysis of numerical data to discover patterns, test relationships, and make predictions (Bhandari, 2021a). In doing quantitative research, surveys, experiments, and systematic observation can be used to collect accurate data.
• Mixed-methods research methodologies combine quantitative and qualitative methods. According to Wisdom and Cresswell (2013), combining quantitative and qualitative research methodologies “permits a more complete and synergistic utilization of data than do separate quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis."

Researchers must consider a variety of factors in choosing the best methodology for their study. In most cases, research questions and objectives play a significant role in defining the most appropriate research methodology to use.

Researchers should also take into account the methods currently used by other researchers in their specific field. For instance, studies have shown the increasing use of mixed-methods research in the health sciences. In their 2019 article “Mixed methods and survey research in family medicine and community health" published in the Family Medicine and Community Health journal, Cresswell and Hirose observed how surveys were used in combination with focus groups on resident physicians’ communication and collaboration competencies:

“Thus, the authors in the Sonnenberg et al. study used an explanatory sequential mixed methods design to examine the ability of the IP clinicians to provide feedback to pediatric residents during their rotation. Using survey research in the first phase, the researchers compared IP supervisors and physician supervisors in terms of communication and if collaborative training objectives were met. …Then, in the second phase, the researchers conducted follow-up qualitative focus groups to probe a contextual understanding of the factors that influenced the process of assessment."

3. Good research acknowledges previous research on the topic.

While good research leads to the discovery of new knowledge, it also means studying previous research on the topic. By studying scholarly articles and other works related to your subject of interest, you get an idea of what has already been studied and how your study fits into existing research. You can easily find related studies by going through your institution’s library management system or other publicly available ones.

As one of the criteria of a good research, exploring previous research can also ensure that you’re not duplicating existing work, which is commonly checked in physics and industrial engineering careers. Related literature can also shed light on potential obstacles and issues researchers may encounter during their studies.

Given the importance of studying research related to one’s topic, most academic research projects (like theses or dissertations) feature a literature review. A literature review describes and objectively evaluates scholarly articles, books, and other credible sources relevant to a particular field of study, helping readers gain a full understanding of the topic at hand (Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania, n.d.).

According to the latest edition of The STM Report from the International Association of Scientific, Technical, and Medical Publishers, there were approximately 33,100 active scholarly peer-reviewed English-language journals in mid-2018. At an annual growth rate of 4%, these journals publish over three million articles a year (Johnson et al., 2018). With these numbers, it appears to be unlikely for researchers to face difficulties in finding literature related to their research topic.

4. Good research uses relevant, empirical data and proper data analysis methods.

One of the most important qualities of a good research study is that it deals with empirical data. Empirical data is data that has been collected by researchers themselves through observation, experience, or experimentation (Bradford, 2017). This is crucial in doing good research because empirical data is considered objective, unbiased evidence.

Good research doesn’t stop with the collection of empirical data, the data collected must be analyzed properly as well. The type of data collected largely determines the right data analysis method to use.

Quantitative data, for instance, is usually analyzed through descriptive statistics or inferential statistics (Humans of Data, 2018). These statistics can help researchers find figures to summarize variables, find patterns, and make predictions. On the other hand, the analysis of qualitative data involves identifying and interpreting patterns and themes in textual data. Common analysis methods for qualitative data include content analysis, narrative analysis, and thematic analysis (Warren, 2020).

Using these analysis methods, you can interpret quantitative or qualitative data to answer your research question.

5. Good research is representative and generalizable.

Criteria of good research include being representative. In research, representativeness refers to a sample’s ability to represent a larger group. This means the characteristics of the subjects (people) being studied closely match those of the study’s target population (Austin Research, 2014).

In most cases, representativeness can be achieved through population sampling (Economic Research and Social Council, n.d.). By using proper methods to create a representative sample, researchers can ensure that their findings can be generalized to the larger population represented.

The table below depicts the uses, advantages, and limitations of the most common sampling methods used by researchers today.

6. Good research is guided by logic.

One of the distinguishing characteristics of research is that the entire process is guided by logic. Using logic, for instance, can help researchers determine what kind of data they need for answering their research question. Being guided by logic throughout the research process also helps researchers spot fallacies and inconsistencies in their claims and findings.

The logical processes of induction and deduction can also prove to be valuable in the research process. Golesh et al. (2019) proposed that logic aids researchers by helping them arrive at valid conclusions. According to the study, inductive reasoning can be used to discover patterns and construct generalizations and theories. Meanwhile, deductive reasoning can help researchers collect empirical data to confirm or refute theories or hypotheses.

Aside from these applications of logic, logical reasoning can also make more research more meaningful, especially if the research is to be used in the context of decision-making (Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, n.d.).

7. Good research has external validity.

Good research has external validity and reliability if its results or findings can be applied to the real world (Glen, 2015). If your research findings can be generalized to other situations or applied to a broader context, your study has high external validity.

There are two types of external validity for researchers to consider: population validity and ecological validity (Bhandari, 2021b). Research with findings that can be generalized from the sample to the larger population has a high population validity. Meanwhile, you can achieve ecological validity if you can apply your study’s findings to real-world situations and settings.

Since generalizable knowledge is almost always the aim of scientific research, external validity is an important component of good research as well.

8. Good research is replicable, reproducible, and transparent.

Replicability, reproducibility, and transparency are some of the most important characteristics of research. The replicability of a research study is important because this allows other researchers to test the study’s findings. Replicability can also improve the trustworthiness of a research’s findings among readers (Understanding Health Research, 2020).

Good research is also reproducible. Though replicability and reproducibility are often used interchangeably, research is reproducible if researchers achieve consistent results using the same data and analysis methods (Miceli, 2019). The reproducibility and replicability of a research study and its findings can confirm the study’s overall validity and credibility.

For research to be replicable or reproducible, it must also be transparent or available to other researchers. Research must follow proper research paper formatting or be written or presented in such a way that it provides comprehensive details on how data was collected and analyzed and how conclusions were reached (Baskin, 2015). This is why most scholarly articles provide clear descriptions of their corresponding research process.

9. Good research acknowledges its limitations and provides suggestions for future research.

In addition to information on data collection and analysis methods, good research also opens doors for future research on the topic. For instance, researchers can provide details on unexpected study findings or suggest techniques for exploring unaddressed aspects of your research problem or research question (Business Research Methodology, n.d.).

In many cases, these suggestions for future research stem from the research’s limitations. Researchers must acknowledge their study’s limitations and potential flaws and present these along with the study’s findings and conclusion. Ross and Zaidi (2019) further explain that a meaningful presentation of a research study’s limitations includes implications of these limitations and potential alternative approaches.

10. Good research is ethical.

Understandably, good research is carried out according to research ethics. According to the World Health Organization, research ethics provide academic research standards for conducting studies. These standards help protect the rights and dignity of research participants while ensuring that researchers practice values, such as honesty, objectivity, integrity, and accountability in their work (Resnik, 2020).

Resnik also emphasizes the importance of learning how to interpret and apply various ethical standards in research, especially since existing ethical codes won’t cover every situation.

Some of the most common violations of research ethics include:

• Falsification This involves the manipulation or omission of data or findings.
• Fabrication This involves making up data or results and presenting these as accurate.
• Plagiarism This refers to the use of another person’s work without giving due credit.

While self-citation and self-referencing are common research methodology best practices among scientists, recent studies show rising trends in excessive self-citation. A 2017 study on citation metrics revealed that at least 250 scientists collected over 50% of their citations from themselves or their co-authors. This figure is significantly higher than the median self-citation rate of 12.7% (Ioannis et al., 2019).

According to the Committee on Publication Ethics, extreme self-citation is a form of citation manipulation. This manipulation may stem from authorities’ over-reliance on citation metrics to make decisions on career advancement and research funding (Van Noorden & Chawla, 2019). As well, academic institutions and private organizations rely on citations to bolster their h-index ranking and overall institution ranking, creating an overly competitive market that invites unscrupulous scientists and organizations to manipulate the system.

Common Pitfalls of Doing Research

Knowing what are the qualities of a good research enables research writers to convey authority and credibility. In addition to the characteristics of good research, researchers must also be aware of the difficulties they may encounter during the course of their study. Shreffler and Huecker (2021) list some of the pitfalls common in the research process:

• Underestimating the commitment required by a research study The process of properly conducting a research study and getting it published takes a significant amount of time and effort. Researchers must be prepared not only for lengthy data collection and analysis methods but also for setbacks, such as subjects dropping out of the study and article revisions.
• Searching for up-to-date, high-quality references Researchers may also encounter challenges in finding related literature or references that are relevant and up-to-date. This is why it’s important to adopt literature review strategies early during the research process.
• Not limiting variables of data to be collected It’s easy to get carried away during the data collection phase and collect as much data as possible. To ensure that the data collection period is used as efficiently as possible, researchers should ignore irrelevant variables in data and focus on the variables that will be most beneficial to the study.

Technology's Role in Enhancing the Quality of Academic Research

How Technology Elevates Academic Research Standards

In the digital age, technology plays an integral role in transforming how academic research is conducted, analyzed, and disseminated. From data collection to publication, innovative tools and platforms have enhanced the efficiency, accuracy, and accessibility of research processes. Below are some key ways technology contributes to improving research quality:

1. Streamlining Data Collection and Analysis

Modern research heavily relies on technology to gather and analyze data. Tools like online survey platforms (e.g., SurveyMonkey, Qualtrics) and IoT devices facilitate real-time data collection from diverse sources. For data analysis, software such as SPSS, R, and Python enable researchers to process large datasets, uncover patterns, and generate actionable insights efficiently.

• Example: Researchers studying climate change use satellite data and AI-powered tools to monitor environmental changes at a granular level, improving the accuracy of their findings.

2. Enhancing Literature Review

Digital libraries, such as PubMed, JSTOR, and Google Scholar, have revolutionized how researchers access academic literature. Advanced search algorithms and citation management tools like Zotero, EndNote, and Mendeley simplify the process of finding and organizing relevant studies, reducing time spent on manual searches.

• Pro Tip: Utilize AI-driven tools like Semantic Scholar to identify emerging trends and gaps in the literature.

3. Facilitating Collaboration Across Borders

Technology enables seamless collaboration among researchers worldwide through platforms like Slack, Microsoft Teams, and cloud-based document sharing tools (e.g., Google Drive, Overleaf). Virtual collaboration not only fosters the exchange of ideas but also enhances the diversity of research perspectives.

• Case Study: The COVID-19 vaccine development saw scientists from different countries using cloud platforms to share data and coordinate efforts in real time.

4. Ensuring Reproducibility and Transparency

Reproducibility and transparency are key qualities of good research. Open science platforms like OSF (Open Science Framework) and GitHub allow researchers to share datasets, code, and methodologies with the global research community. This promotes accountability and enables other researchers to verify findings.

• Key Insight: Journals increasingly require authors to provide supplementary data files or code repositories to ensure transparency.

5. Automating Citation and Publication

Citation management tools automate the generation of bibliographies in various styles, reducing the risk of citation errors. Additionally, academic publishing platforms with integrated plagiarism detection (e.g., Turnitin, iThenticate) ensure that research adheres to ethical standards.

• Tip: Use tools like Grammarly and Hemingway Editor for refining research papers, ensuring clarity and coherence.

6. Leveraging Artificial Intelligence

AI-driven tools are revolutionizing academic research by automating complex tasks. For example, natural language processing (NLP) can summarize lengthy documents, while machine learning models can predict research trends or outcomes based on historical data.

• Example: AI-based platforms like Research Rabbit and Connected Papers provide visualization of related studies, helping researchers map out connections and identify underexplored areas.

7. Expanding Research Accessibility

Open-access journals and digital repositories make academic research widely accessible to the public and researchers in developing countries. Platforms like ResearchGate and Academia.edu provide avenues for sharing preprints and published articles, fostering inclusivity in academic discourse.

• Impact: Improved accessibility ensures that valuable research insights reach broader audiences, including policymakers, educators, and practitioners.

Can advanced degree programs elevate research quality?

Advanced degree programs offer specialized skill development and exposure to cutting-edge research methodologies that may not be fully addressed in undergraduate studies. They facilitate a deeper understanding of innovative analytical tools, refined data interpretation techniques, and the ethical frameworks essential for modern research. Furthermore, short, intensive programs, such as 1 year master's programs online, can accelerate learning and provide the practical expertise needed to enhance the credibility and impact of academic research.

How Can Mentorship and Professional Development Enhance Research Quality?

Effective mentorship programs provide nuanced guidance and expose researchers to advanced analytical techniques and critical perspectives without compromising ethical standards. Engaging with experienced professionals fosters an environment of rigorous inquiry and consistent quality improvement, while targeted professional development initiatives, such as online graduate certificate programs, enable researchers to refine their skill set and adapt to emerging challenges.

Is your research good enough?

Hopefully, this guide on the qualities of good research has helped you evaluate whether your study is on the right track. Good research starts with a sound research question, which influences the research methodology, including data collection and analysis methods.

The findings of a good research study are based on empirical data collected from a sample representative of the population. More importantly, good research is ethical and transparent. Transparency is crucial in ensuring that a research study is replicable and reproducible. Moreover, you would want your work to be visible, so improving your digital footprint also helps.

If you’re looking for more ways to improve your research study, you can also check out our guide on writing a research paper for publication.

The Importance of Adaptability in Modern Research Practices

Academic research is inherently dynamic, often requiring professionals to adapt to emerging trends, technologies, and challenges. One vital aspect of adaptability today is the ability to pursue education and skill enhancement while managing rigorous research schedules. For many professionals and students, integrating continuous learning that complements their research ambitions has become crucial.

One noteworthy option is enrolling in programs from a self paced online college. These institutions offer flexible course structures, allowing researchers to acquire new skills and knowledge at their own pace, without compromising their time devoted to academic endeavors. Such adaptability ensures that researchers remain competitive and updated in their respective fields.

Moreover, adaptability extends beyond acquiring education. It involves leveraging innovative tools and methodologies to address unique research challenges. Whether it's adopting ethical AI for data analysis, learning new statistical models through workshops, or experimenting with interdisciplinary approaches, flexibility enhances the depth and relevance of modern research.

Ultimately, the ability to adapt ensures that academic research remains innovative, practical, and impactful in addressing real-world problems.

How Can Structured Academic Training Enhance Research Quality?

Structured academic training plays a critical role in equipping researchers with advanced methodologies, ethical frameworks, and analytical skills essential for high-quality studies. Comprehensive programs and specialized certifications help scholars master contemporary data analysis techniques, improve study design, and navigate emerging research challenges. This targeted educational approach not only refines technical competencies but also fosters a culture of critical inquiry and continuous improvement. Access to flexible learning options, such as the easiest online degrees that pay well, further supports professionals in adapting to evolving academic standards and interdisciplinary demands.

How Does Funding and Resource Allocation Impact Academic Research Quality?

Securing adequate funding and managing resources effectively are critical variables in elevating academic research quality. Robust financial support facilitates access to advanced technologies, comprehensive data collection tools, and expert personnel, thereby enhancing the validity and scope of research findings. Strategic resource allocation enables researchers to invest in quality control measures, cutting-edge methodologies, and continuous professional development. Institutional support and targeted grant initiatives can foster a stable research environment, where ethical standards and rigorous reproducibility are maintained. Researchers can also leverage educational opportunities, such as affordable online bachelor degree programs, to enhance their competencies, optimize resource utilization, and ultimately drive impactful research outcomes.

How Can Open Access and Publication Strategies Optimize Research Impact?

Leveraging open access platforms and strategic publication channels increases research visibility and facilitates broader engagement with both academic peers and industry professionals. Researchers who publish in reputable open access journals not only enhance the credibility of their work but also simplify data sharing and post-publication peer review, thereby extending the lifecycle of their research findings. Furthermore, a robust digital dissemination strategy—encompassing preprints, institutional repositories, and media outreach—can create pathways to influential networks and high-profile opportunities, including opportunities in careers that pay 100k a year. This approach supports ongoing collaboration, encourages interdisciplinary innovation, and ultimately contributes to a dynamic, transparent research ecosystem.

How Does Interdisciplinary Collaboration Enhance Research Outcomes?

Interdisciplinary collaboration unites experts from diverse fields to address complex research challenges with innovative approaches. This integration of varied perspectives not only broadens methodological frameworks but also bolsters the study’s external validity and overall credibility. Collaborators benefit from shared resources, unique skill sets, and complementary analytical techniques, which can lead to novel research questions and refined data interpretations. Leveraging diverse educational opportunities—such as what degree can I get online in 6 months—further equips researchers to adapt to emerging trends and maintain competitive, high-quality research practices.

How Do Career Incentives Shape Academic Research Quality?

Academic research quality is influenced not only by methodological rigor but also by the career incentives that drive researchers to excel. Competitive compensation and clear advancement pathways foster an environment where innovation and ethical practices are prioritized. Structured incentive programs, including performance-based rewards and professional development opportunities, contribute to sustained commitment and higher standards within research communities. Aligning academic rewards with excellence can attract top talent and stimulate continuous improvement, enhancing both the integrity and impact of research outcomes. For instance, pursuing highest paid associate degrees may serve as a strategic step toward building a rewarding career while reinforcing a commitment to high-quality research.

Key Insights

• Sound Research Question: A good research study starts with a well-defined, clear research question that guides the study's scope and objectives.
• Appropriate Methodology: The choice of research methodology is crucial. It ensures that data collection and analysis are valid, reliable, and suitable for the research question.
• Literature Review: Good research acknowledges and builds upon existing studies, ensuring the researcher is informed about the current state of knowledge in the field.
• Empirical Data and Analysis: Effective research relies on empirical data and appropriate data analysis methods to produce unbiased and objective findings.
• Representativeness and Generalizability: Research should be based on a representative sample to ensure findings can be generalized to a larger population.
• Logical Framework: The research process should be guided by logic, using inductive and deductive reasoning to reach valid conclusions.
• External Validity: Research findings should be applicable to real-world contexts and generalizable to other situations.
• Replicability and Transparency: Good research is replicable and reproducible, with transparent methodologies and clear reporting to allow for verification by other researchers.
• Acknowledging Limitations: Researchers should openly acknowledge the limitations of their studies and suggest directions for future research.
• Ethical Conduct: Adhering to ethical standards is essential, including honesty, integrity, and accountability in conducting and reporting research.

References:

1. ARTiFACTS. (2020, April 20). What is academic research and what does it look like in practice? ARTiFACTS
2. Austin Research. (2014, July 30). The importance of representative samples and how to get them. Austin Research
3. Baskin, P. (2020, December 22). Transparency in research and reporting: Expanding the effort through new tools for authors and editors. Editage Insights
4. Belmont University. (2021, April 30). Research guides: Public relations: Academic and applied research. Research Guides at Belmont University
5. Bhandari, P. (2021a). What is quantitative research? | Definition, uses and methods. Scribbr
6. Bhandari, P. (2021b). External validity | Types, threats & examples. Scribbr
7. Bradford, A. (2017, July 28). Empirical evidence: A definition. Live Science
8. Business Research Methodology. (n.d.). Suggestions for future research. Research-Methodology
9. Creswell, J. W., & Hirose, M. (2019). Mixed methods and survey research in family medicine and community health. Family Medicine and Community Health, 7(2). NCBI
10. Cummings, S. R., Browner, W. S., & Hulley, S. B. (2013). Conceiving the research question and developing the study plan. Designing clinical research, 4, 14-22. Wolters Kluwer Health
11. Economic and Social Research Council. (n.d.). Methodologies: What makes good research? ESRC
12. Editage Insights. (2019, July 19). What does good research mean? Editage Insights
13. Farrugia, P., Petrisor, B. A., Farrokhyar, F., & Bhandari, M. (2010). Research questions, hypotheses and objectives. Canadian journal of surgery, 53(4), 278. NCBI
14. Glen, S. (2019, June 27). External validity definition & examples. Statistics How To
15. Golesh, D., Baba Girei, Z., & Ibrahim, F. (n.d.). The role of logic in research. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 10(10), 894-904. IJSER
16. Humans of Data. (2019, July 12). Your guide to qualitative and quantitative data analysis methods. Humans of Data
17. Ioannidis, J. P., Baas, J., Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2019). A standardized citation metrics author database annotated for scientific field. PLoS biology, 17(8), e3000384. PLoS Biology
18. Jansen, D. (2021, June 21). What is research methodology? Simple definition (With examples). Grad Coach
19. Mehran University of Engineering and Technology. (n.d.). Criteria of good research. MUET-CRP
20. Miceli, S. (2019, September 3). Reproducibility and replicability in research. The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 
21. Nature Index. (n.d.). United States of America (USA) | Country outputs. Retrieved July 9, 2021, from Nature Index
22. Pathak, V., Jena, B., & Kalra, S. (2013). Qualitative research. Perspectives in clinical research, 4(3). ProQuest
23. Resnik, D. (2020, December 23). What is ethics in research & why is it important? National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
24. Ross, P. T., & Zaidi, N. L. B. (2019). Limited by our limitations. Perspectives on medical education, 8(4), 261-264. NCBI
25. Shreffler, J., & Huecker, M. R. (2021). Common Pitfalls In The Research Process. NCBI
26. Thattamparambil, N. (2020, November 22). How to choose the research methodology best suited for your study. Editage Insights
27. Understanding Health Research. (n.d.). Replicability. Understanding Health Research
28. Van Noorden, R., & Chawla, D. (2019, August 19). Hundreds of extreme self-citing scientists revealed in new database. Nature
29. Ware, M., & Mabe, M. (2015). The STM report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing. STM
30. Warren, K. (2021, June 21). Qualitative data analysis methods 101: Top 5 + examples. Grad Coach
31. Wisdom, J., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Mixed methods: integrating quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis while studying patient-centered medical home models. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. AHRQ

Other Things You Should Know About Good Academic Research